3QN2!

So, the last editorial I read was about the restrictions on guns. The issue at hand was not just about guns in general, but if it was logical to let past criminals who exercised domestic violence to own guns. Some opposed the criminals of having guns because they could hurt victims of domestic violence to more of an extent, possibly kill them. However, others argued that restricition of guns to those criminals will only make them find other weapons of abuse which could prolong domestic violence and lead to traumatizing abuse. Personally, I think guns should have had stricter laws years ago. But, there is some truth to those who argue against the stricter laws, because if the law allows past criminals to obatin guns, than there is nothing that I could do about that. However, there should be more of an effort for change so there could be some kind of elimination of domestic violence.